Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 15:13:48 10/05/97
Go up one level in this thread
>Posted by Thorsten Czub on October 05, 1997 at 17:45:34: >In Reply to: Re: CCC-I test set posted by Ed Schröder on October 04, 1997 at >13:36:30: >>Results for Rebel9 PII/266 >>bm Rxe6; 2:09 >>bm Bxg7; 0:18 >>bm Ng4!; 0:42 >>bm Nxf7; 1:07 >>bm Rc3!!; not found >>am Qxh6??; not found >>bm Rh3+ M15; 0:44 >>bm Bd4+ M15; not found >>bm Rxh7 M16; 0:48 (Rebel9 says Mate in 16, correct?) >>bm Qxf3 M7; 1:09 >>bm b3!; 0:07 >>So Rebel9 got 8 out of 11. >>- Ed - >Uff - I am impressed Ed. Well you should try CCC-II too. CCC-II is a selection of my database where Rebel suffers for years. Today I was surprised to see Rebel9 got 2 of them after all. So I am very curious how other programs do. - Ed - >Here the results of cstal and fritz5 again: >Fr5 P200MMX/40MB hash CSTal k6/200 >Pos 1 - 4'' - (prefers Bh6) >Pos 2 - 14'' 2" >Pos 3 - 8'' 14" >Pos 4 - 110'' - >Pos 5 - >5' - >Pos 6 - >5' - (this is a mean position Ed !) >Pos 7 - 131'' - (found in 9" but without mate) >Pos 8 - >5' 7" >Pos 9 - >5' - (found in 9" but without mate) >Pos 10- 25'' - >Pos 11- 5'' - >Hm - maybe we should stop teaching program to play chess and concentrate >on a faster search, what do you think >Chris ????!! :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.