Author: Amir Ban
Date: 09:07:49 10/06/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 1997 at 07:06:03, Chris Whittington wrote: > >On October 05, 1997 at 04:08:43, Amir Ban wrote: > >> >>Let's try to analyze the critical variation in DB-GK game 2. The move is >>36 (axb5 was played, don't confuse it with move 37). >> >>The variation to look at is after 36. Qb6 Qe7 37. axb5 Rab8 38. Qxa6 e4 >>39. Bxe4 Qe5. What does Black have here ? >> >>At ply (or whatever) 10, DB gives this PV: >> >>Qb6 Qe7 axb5 Rab8 Qxa6 e4 Bxe4 Qe5 Bf3 (at lower depths it tries g4) Bf3 >>Rd8 Qa7 Qxc3 Bh5 +0.74. >> >>At ply 11, there is no PV and the eval is +0.48. >> >>This variation was mentioned by Seirawan in his analysis, and the GK >>team used Hiarc & Fritz to analyze it to death. >> >>Junior, by the way, likes an intermediate 37...a5, which creates the >>same position but with Ra2 misplaced. >> >>What do you make of this ? > >I know it sounds a bit pathetic, but to make this easier, can somebody >post the PGN of game 2 ...... > > >Chris > >> >>Amir Pathetic indeed. You can find it, for example, on Ed's site under http://www.xs4all.nl/~rebchess/dbx2.htm or in the ICCAJ June 96. Ed, how about giving this analysis a shot ? Amir
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.