Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 05:51:28 10/23/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 1997 at 08:37:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 23, 1997 at 04:39:31, Chris Whittington wrote: > >> >>Go grub around in my recent posts. You'll find the numbers were given >>BEFORE you asked for them. >> >>If you want to try and deflect the criticism with red herrings, at >>least use herrings that haven't already been netted. >> >>Chris >> > >I did, and I found *nothing* useful. Not looking hard enough then. > Let me rephrase: > > the basic AMD K6/233 has a performance factor of 1.0 in this >discussion. The PII/300 is "ok" by your definition, yet it is faster >than the K6. Perhaps 20%. But that is "ok". > >Now what I want you to say is that the above represents your thought >before I give you a little simple math that will show that the 500mhz >alphas are in the same ballpark with the PII/300. Are you able to phrase anything in non-arrogantese ? > >I want an *exact* multiplier that you find acceptable. IE 1.2X is OK. >You haven't done that. You only say PII is ok, alpha is not. I want a >number to work with... simple, really... I've given one already. Go look for it. Chris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.