Author: Masciulli Gianluigi
Date: 02:57:05 05/18/00
All the evaluation score, more or less, are based on the pawn value. that's fine but suppose is the black to move: some program (type A) say's +1.00 when white is better a pawn and some other program (type B) says the position is -1.00 seeing form side to move perpective. the type b approch is quite disturbing while you analize a game (exemple giving) with a program like crafty that will do something like this +1 34)Ne4 -1 34) ... Nf3 +1 35)Ne2 +4 35) ... Bh2 -1 36)Qf2 -1 36) .. Rh7 -2 37)Ka1 considering the side to move look a bit confusing for me WHY not settle (TYPE A) as a standard so an analisys like +1 34)Ne4 :white ok +1 34) ... Nf3 :nothing new +1 35)Ne2 :nothing new -4 35) ... Bh2 :bad surprise for the white black: can kill him -1 36)Qf2 :missed to do so but... +1 36) .. Rh7 :white ok again -2 37)Ka1 :black is really better now ..and so on teh situation is horrible when i dont know the type of the program sometime I find on CCC posts that say: "my program say that position is a -2.45" so i have to go to the post with the position anddiscover 1) what the side to move 2) what type is "his" program (some time is not so easy to discover this :( Setting (TYPE A) as standard may be much better for lazy people like me. In any case, even if most of the program like (TYPE B) more, A standard is better than NO STANDARD!! ciao glm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.