Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 13:04:49 04/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2001 at 13:55:53, Victor Zakharov wrote: >On April 03, 2001 at 12:25:36, Bernd Haehnle wrote: > >>Thanks a lot for your useful informations. Before I asked in this forum, I wrote >>to the support of convecta, but I didnt´t receive any answer. A small message >>similar to: "we check your problem, be patient" >>could avoid a discussion in this forum, which is not good for the imgage of a >>really good product like CA 6.0. >> >>Bernd > >Bernd, thanks for these words. What could I say about the support? First of all >it was HDD crash on the support computer. So some delays these days are very >probable. Anyway I don't want to say that our support is excelent. We just >changed a person here and it takes some time for him to feel the work. > >And anyway any critique about CA on any forums is wellcome as it helps to make >product and related services better. > >BTW, what is the progress with your Shredder TBs under CA6. You could write me >directly for technical details. All works on my side. > >Victor Viktor, Just like Bernd, I have to thank you for the support you offer to users! Anyway, I have set up the tablebases quite easily, but look at the following position and tell me if your Tiger 14 gets it right: kB6/2K5/8/8/b3N3/8/8/8 w - - The winning move is, naturally, Nd6!, with a quick mate, but Tiger 14, using its tablebases (!) comes up with Ng3??? (depth 98), evaluating the position as 0.00 (draw). What went wrong. The position is from Convekta's great prog, Studies 2.0 #160, I think. Best regards, *** Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.