Author: fca
Date: 18:37:39 04/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 1998 at 11:35:11, Bruce Moreland wrote: >I don't think anonymous posting has any place here. There shouldn't be >any need to worry about attacks here. Wholly incorrect, Bruce. :-) "Substance over form"; also, the message is more important than the messenger The instant the anonymous poster *abuses* - using that term in _any_ of its senses - the moderator(s) must use the sanctions available. Until then - what is the issue? As to the point that others waste time speculating - well: (1) Let them do it in rgcc preferably :-) (2) They would probably speculate about something else equally irrelevant if not about this issue :-)) The speculation re ID was entirely started by A.N.Other (who does not post here) in rgcc. That I have received abusive email (from one perhaps unable to win battles of logic in the rgcc debate about moderation) is an *excellent* reason for continuing with anonymity.... I would like Bruce to agree there is sense in what I have written.... fca 1, bruce 0 or is that too contentious? :-) Kind regards fca PS: this is my only non-cc specific post here
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.