Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 23:00:07 04/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
If you mean that Fritz 5 and Junior 4.6 are root processors, has anybody developed a definitive test set of positions that show this? Since the amount of knowledge applied to the tips vs the root evaluations is all relative, it is difficult to classify root processors as completely separate from leaf processors. Nimzo is the classical root processor, with Fritz not far behind and I suspect that Junior is also fairly close to the root processor end of the scale. -- Komputer Korner On April 27, 1998 at 00:28:29, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 25, 1998 at 03:03:18, blass uri wrote: > >>On April 25, 1998 at 02:39:15, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>Looks like you are really in love with Junior. And love is blind. :) >>> >>> >>> Christophe > >>I admit I love Junior because I am from Israel > >Thanks for this very honnest reply. I think it's better to say it >franckly. I didn't want to be agressive in my previous post, so I didn't >mention the fact that you are from Israel too. > >Anyway, Junior seems to be a good program, so you have at least 2 good >reasons to be in love with it! :) > > >>but I want to know >>if there are other programs that are not sensitive to the root position? > >Rebel seems quite unaffected by the root position. CM4000 too (I don't >know about CM5000). > >Genius IS sensitive to the root position, and Fritz seems to be even >more, as everybody knows. > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.