Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 10:59:01 08/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
>Unfortunately I found only one volunteer to help me to >analyze the positions that deeper blue pondered and >I am not going to use more than 20 hours of computer time >per week to analyze. > >Uri I would be glad to help as i said before but there is one problem, I know that i have seen the analysis of different positions in which a commercial will find the move played however we would have to go through the log files alot closer than you think as some moves are given in the mainline of others. For example i posted recently about Deeper Blue playing h5 when it saw this at 11/6 from 3 or 4 moves earlier so this will probably show to require much more time than we think...........But when you think about the draw missed by Kasparov this should've come up in the pv from earlier moves but i didn't see it, It is supposed to be too deep for DB so when micros find this move can they be picking it for the wrong reasons ? If not then clearly Deep Blue searched positions differently and better, for example several times a top commercial will find the correct move in the pv for test sets yet change it's mind. If we are going to do this it should be under strict rules agreed apon by people who think deeper blue is stronger and those that do not. I don't know if Prof. Hyatt would participate or not but i think if he would this would bring closeure for the time being ...atleast untill either the DF-Kramnik match and or DB being ressurected to play weather that be against DF or any other program.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.