Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:10:56 08/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2001 at 17:17:45, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 29, 2001 at 15:43:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I discovered, by bits and pieces, some of the knowledge in deep >>thought, and it was not "small" at all. Everyone assumes that the micros are >>much smarter... > >There is no need to 'assume' or 'discover' or speculate about >anything. > >Go to Tim Mann's site and download the Deep Thought eval tuner. >It includes the full evaluation of Deep Thought and the set of >weights used in the 1988 US Open. > >-- >GCP The "weights" don't always reveal what they stand for. I've had the DT code for at least 2 years. It isn't new. But I can give you the weights I use in Crafty and they don't tell you _what_ I am actually doing with them, only the numbers I am using. Their bishop of opposite color + pawn ending evaluation was _very_ good. Once Hsu explained it to me at an ACM event. You won't find that explanation of how it works in the stuff you reference. Which is a shame, actually. There's a lot in the thing that we won't ever know in great detail.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.