Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 08:56:59 11/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2002 at 11:38:40, David Rasmussen wrote: >On November 26, 2002 at 10:28:24, Sune Fischer wrote: > >> >>You must have some extension that goes mad, like a threat extension or >>something. I get around 55% qnodes, so you are right it is high but not _that_ >>high. >> > >An extension? They're Q-nodes, and I don't "extend" in Q-search. I know, but you might have some extension that guides the position into something extremely tactical. Doesn't sound logical, but who knows if it's possible in a rare situation. >That's just as good (or better). But I don't think it can be measured at all if >I do this or that. And the counts should be the same anyway. It's conceptually >simpler, though, which is why I might change how I do it. > >It's still a mystery why I get 97% qNodes in this position. > >/David >00:00:12.47 6313kn 07/10/21 --------------------------------------------------- >00:00:28.12 14Mn 08/11/22 6/48 19. Rae1 > > Time used: 00:00:30.00 > nps: 497701 nodes: 14936023 Q-nodes: 14513023 (97%) > move order: 88% > hash probes: 112554 hash hits: 26981 (23%) hash usage: 2% > pawn hash probes: 14816435 pawn hash hits: 14807848 (99%) > EGTB probes: 0 EGTB hits: 0 (0%) normal nodes: 14936023 - 14513023 = 432000 So thats: 14513023 / 432000 >= 33 !? That's more than 33 captures per leaf node, that's a lot I think. Are you sure you haven't reversed a sign on the move ordering of these captures? -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.