Author: Serge Desmarais
Date: 17:53:00 09/17/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1998 at 17:46:21, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On September 17, 1998 at 16:51:18, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On September 17, 1998 at 15:39:45, Moritz Berger wrote: >> >>"interesting" is IMO that you feel the need to quote this here, even to >>translate this rubbish interview stuff here. >> >>there is NO excuse for the nunn-test. >>the nunn test was, so says css itself, done by nunn for css. he has done it >>specially for his friend frederic. >>frederic is owner of chessBase. >> >>it is the same when the owner of malboro asks a special cancer-doctor to write >>an article about smoking not beeing dangerous. >> >>you now quote anywhere that smoking is not dangerous because john nunn has said >>this. >> >>and frederic paid for this... brilliant. > >In other words, Nunn came with a crooked test to favor Fritz. Old song of yours >and utter nonsense. > >If anything, one might say that having few positions, the test can be already >cooked by more than one. Although certainly not by Mark and his Hiarcs 6 playing >Moritz games. > >Enrique As I know Fritz is reported to have a lot of trouble understanding/playing the positions deriving from the French defense, so to favor Fritz, one would have suppressed tha positions from the French? Serge Desmarais
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.