Author: Sally Weltrop
Date: 22:09:39 03/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2003 at 19:35:44, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On March 14, 2003 at 12:31:45, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>just take a look here: http://www.quarkchess.de/html/deep9_1.html >> >>Greets, Thomas > >Thanks for your investigation on this subject, Thomas. And to answer your >question on the last page of your analysis: No, we don't need more proof. The >data you presented is very convincing. I'll say! I second that motion. > >Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.