Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:27:27 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 14:22:01, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >Hi Uri, > >On June 24, 2003 at 13:30:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>It seems that you assume that people tend to prefer FRC when no money is >>involved. >>I think that you are wrong here. > >A lot of new players would prefer FRC because there would be no need >to learn openings from a lot of books. FRC will therefore make chess >more attractive to a lot of new fans, who can start very soon playing >attractive games of FRC. I do not think that people asked new players if they prefer FRC and not shuffle chess. If the target is not to learn opening than shuffle chess is also enough. I also think that the main strength of GM's is not opening theory and I believe that they can be better on similiar game when no theory is available. The value of theory is not so high and I expect the top commercial with no opening book to score more than 50% even against amateurs like Crafty or Yace. New comers are losing against GM's mainly because of reasons that are not theory. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.