Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?)

Author: Andrew Williams

Date: 10:30:56 08/20/03

Go up one level in this thread

On August 19, 2003 at 16:12:20, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On August 19, 2003 at 15:24:59, Dan Andersson wrote:
>
>> IMO the extra information is worth it even in endgames. And it's not much
>>slower than x088 anyway.
>>
>>MvH Dan Andersson
>
>I'm scepetical.
>Are you sure you have not overlooked some possible optimizations with 0x88?
>
>-S.

I don't know anything about Dan's implementation, but PostModernist does exactly
what he describes. I'm not convinced that it's better than not doing it, but
having put the work into getting it work correctly, I'm never going to get rid
of it!

Andrew

• Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:48:59 08/20/03
  • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 08:52:18 08/21/03
    • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 09:12:25 08/21/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.