Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 13:20:17 09/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2003 at 03:04:11, Steven Edwards wrote: >and > > LoseIn107 // Must have a tablebase for this one! Not really. With the help of backwards analysis, I could prove a mate in 180 or so, in a position, where TBs play no role. The result is a lower bound (of course - for my engine - there is no way to prove, that this is the shortest mate). Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.