Author: Steven Edwards
Date: 03:51:45 09/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 03:45:50, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On September 10, 2003 at 19:28:41, Steven Edwards wrote: >>On September 10, 2003 at 19:19:32, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>On September 10, 2003 at 18:56:00, Steven Edwards wrote: >>>>On September 10, 2003 at 09:05:39, Alastair Scott wrote: >Please don't overlook my comments re: NAGs. I believe that is the single most >important issue mentioned (that defacto use is incompatible with the standard). Fear not! Verily, the NAG list will be extended as needed so as to fulfill its noble purpose as a host glyph independent manner of representing annotative glyphs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.