Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:15:34 12/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2003 at 14:52:28, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On December 09, 2003 at 14:26:47, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On December 09, 2003 at 10:59:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>"An operator can only (1) type in moves and (2) respond to request from >>>the compute for clock information." >>> >>> >>>How, from that rule, does it become possible for the operator to say "Hmm. >>>the engine claims a draw, >> >>The engine didn't claim a draw. >> >>Unless you consider the interface part of the engine, but that's IMHO >>another discussion. If the Jonny engine would have claimed the draw > >How? Apparently the engine is supposed to bypass the GUI completely and carry on some sort of dialog with the operator directly, which sort of seems to be contrary to the basic idea of a GUI in the first place. > > > >>I would agree with you but given the facts I consider the ICGA decision >>also acceptable. >> >>-- >>GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.