Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: definition of clones: Danchess an Crafty

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 09:26:49 02/16/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 16, 2004 at 12:10:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 16, 2004 at 12:04:02, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On February 15, 2004 at 13:24:54, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>I understood from the winboard forum that Bob considers DanChess as a crafty
>>>clone and the question is what is the definition of a clone.
>>
>>>I remember from slater's post in this forum that if most of the code is
>>>different you cannot win in court by complaining that it is a clone.
>>
>>Slate is wrong. Even if 5% of the code is similar you have a major problem.
>>
>>I hope you realize that the SCO claims go about less 5% of the total code.
>>
>>It is trivial that if this gets proven, that the owner of that code can ask
>>major money and will get so. In case of SCO the dispute is therefore not only
>>how many lines are similar, but especially 'who owns what'.
>>
>>In this case 'who owns what' is very clear.
>>So if then the statement is that 30% of the code is similar, then this courtcase
>>will be less than 30 minutes to decide that Hyatt owns that program more or
>>less.
>>
>>>I understood from Dann's post that only 30% of the code of DanChess is
>>>similiar(that does not mean the same as Crafty).
>>>
>>>Dann Corbit posted in the winboard forum the SEE function of Danchess that is
>>>similiar to Crafty.
>>>I wonder if it is really the main reason that Bob considers Danchess as a clone
>>>or only one of the reasons.
>>
>>Bob is correct. Legally, juridically, and also practically. Not to mention that
>>Bob has the creative rights also (hope i did translate that correct).
>
>"Creative rights" are not the issue here, for me.  Just trying to control the
>out-of-sight cloning problems that have abounded the past few years.  I don't
>mind anybody using my ideas.  But I don't want source code copied with the goal
>of creating a "unique program" that really "isn't".

A small courtcase will ensure you can demand the source code to be published.
This is a very easy thing to do. Also demand money in case he doesn't quickly
apply to the demands to publish the source code.

>>
>>>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.