Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:51:35 02/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2004 at 13:38:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 16, 2004 at 13:22:56, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >>It is important to make things clear because Dann Corbit in the winboard forum >>even suggested that it may be a bad idea to read crafty's code > >This doesn't make much sense to me. I can't imagine a better way to learn about >the insides of a chess program than to look at the source, particularly when the >program is written like Crafty with about a 50-50 ratio of instructions to >comments. If borrowing ideas was bad, then he might be right. But you can look >at a program without borrowing source... If you are not allowed to apply what you learn, what is the purpose of reading it?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.