Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: definition of clones: Danchess an Crafty

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:15:01 02/17/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2004 at 19:10:55, Bo Persson wrote:
[snip]
>If that was the only reason, maybe. On the other hand, the two most obvious ways
>to number bits is left-to-right and right-to-left, so it is just
>circumstantial(?) evidence at best. :-)

Unless you worked with old DEC stuff.  Then you would number them
15..0, 32..15, ...

>Now I know that Bob got his numbering from the Cray bit scanning instructions,
>while I found it equally obvious to map my enum {a1, b1, c1, ...} to the equally
>numbered bits on a PC processor. That just happened to be right to left.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.