Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 22:22:06 07/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2004 at 01:14:09, Daniel Shawul wrote: >On July 03, 2004 at 01:00:59, Tor Lattimore wrote: > >>Hi. >>I'm implementing a pawn hash in my program, I'm wondering what sort of size it >>should be compared to the main transpos table? I'm assuming it can be *alot* >>smaller, any stats on how much smaller is good? >>cheers >>Tor > >1 Meg is more than enough for a pawn hash. Making it larger will not >profit you much. ofcourse the no of entries depends on the size of the data you store. So it is better not to depend on size. Also if you do a lot of calculation for pawns , making it more larger may be better because every hit saves the extra work. daniel > >daniel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.