Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 15:16:37 01/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 1999 at 17:31:15, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >I contacted a technical advisor from Saitek in Hong Kong who assured me that >Brute Force was superior to Selective Search. His reason was that Brute Force >searches more extensively and therefore minimizes the risk of an occasional >oversight. Apparently the Selective Search is quicker but not as thorough. So, >from this I would assume that IM Larry Feldman was wrong or misinformed. It is a >shame that he has not responded to my query. However, it does appear he was not >correct in what was stated in his review. Melvin, I did not read the news article that IM the Larry Feldman wrote. Also I did not read his question to IM Larry, for this reason I am asking: which the amount of brute force? which the degree of selective search? Thanks Paulo Soares
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.