Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 01:36:16 02/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2005 at 03:13:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 08, 2005 at 00:09:45, Daniel Shawul wrote: > >>Hello every one, >> I read in the threads below that some people still suspect >>danchess to be a clone. It is not a clone of any engine . If any body has any >>doubts , he can ask me and i can send the source to a reliable person so that >>it is checked. But please don't make posts here and there telling what you think >>it is. >> Danchess is participating in every other tournament because >>it is found not to be a clone. In WBEC for example a group of people checked it >>and found it not to be a clone so it is participating. There is no place ,at >>least one that i know of, that danchess is not particaipating because of this >>issue. >>I have sent my source to Hyatt a couple of times but i do not know if he checked >>it or not,becaues i have got no response. If he wants i can send it to him >>again,but it will only be a waste of his time and mine since there is no >>similarity. >> My current version is as strong as crafty even better which i am very proud >>of. Check the games at AEGT where danchess trashed crafty 7.5 - 2.5. > >I checked the rating list > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40400402.txt > >It is at least not clear that Danchess is better than Crafty and Crafty19.15 has >better rating. > >Uri as i said above,my intention is not to claim dancess is better than crafty. What matters to me is it is no easy oppoent for it anymore. At least it is clear for me,danchess has 50 % chance against it in any kind of match(on the same hardware). I gave the aegt example just to demonstrate that on a very bad day for crafty ,danchess could be a very tough opponent for it(even win by a clear margin). Nothing more.. daniel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.