Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 19:35:18 02/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2005 at 21:59:19, Alex Newman wrote: >On February 08, 2005 at 02:47:56, Daniel Shawul wrote: >Taking someones code, and then rewriting it, is the same as cloning to me. that's is not the case for me. >I can't say you did that, so this is not an accusation, but Mr. Hyatt may think >you did just that. > I just want him to look at what i have right now and tell all those people who have doubts here what he thinks it is. This i think will clear up things once and for all and save us all the trouble. But if he is not interested what can i do but to keep on working. if you call the following rewrite of crafty,we certainly have different opinions. - different search - different evaluation (mine is relatively knowledge based while crafty is fast searcher). that's why mine is 1/4 as fast as crafty (in Nps) but is not 1/4 as bad. - has a different style of play - which has completely different data structures - the only subroutine that i remeber similar was a simple utility function used for display. [i always make sure i have nothing same as crafty since the accusation] I will send my source one more time to him incase he hasn't read this thread. I am doing everything on my part to to resolve the matter. That's why I consider any more accusations to be not based on anything,just trolls. daniel >>On February 08, 2005 at 00:28:39, Madhavan wrote: >> >>>Daniel, >>> >>>i was the one who asked Uri about Danchess/Crafty issue >>>i did not know what happened after Hyatt said in a post that one of the older >>>version contains 30% of crafty's >>> >>>Uri said that you have rewritten completely,so its fine >>>i did not make a post stating "what happened to Danchess/crafty Issue" >>>i meant i did not start a thread.i just asked Uri,because Uri is the only >>>programmer who is most active in engines and programming topics besides Dann >>> >>>there is nothing wrong with the latest Danchess Version >> >>i certainly did not take it that way. >>if your intention is just to know about the issue, that is fine. >>daniel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.