Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 07:44:22 02/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2005 at 19:02:00, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 17, 2005 at 15:59:07, David Dahlem wrote: > >>Wouldn't the best way to test the importance of opening books be to test an >>engine without a book against the same engine with a good opening book? > >No > >The best test is to test against another opponent. > >results between different personalities of the same engine can be misleading so >if you want to test the value of Hiarcs book you need to test it against a third >opponent. > >Uri Do you have facts that really support this asseveration? What tests? What results have you ever run? I doubt you have ever run such a test to support this. It is nasty to asnwer in such hard way when you dont have any support. Thefore, my answer is in the same way: _No_ :)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.