Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 22:28:46 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 17:08:23, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] > >The point is that using them in the discussion about the value of book is >irrelevant if the public book of shredder is not considered by you as a good >book. > >Uri I was not talking the public book. Recall my statement "This all supposes the authors are willing to let their tournament prepared books out, which I doubt" Perhaps I created confusion by saying "you could test" since you can't test if the book is not public. Let me rephrase. To prove or disprove Vincent's statement you would need to test using a program with a tuned book such as Diep or Zappa using Arturo's book or Shredder using Sandro's book. What Arturo thinks about Shredder's book has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. My sole point is that, IMO, Tord did not test with the type book Vincent described when he made his statement regarding the value of the book. Best Dan H.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.