Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 09:25:37 02/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2005 at 11:04:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 20, 2005 at 08:39:47, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On February 20, 2005 at 07:08:45, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>Uri, >>> >>>do you think Kasparov can win without home preparation and without reading book >>>and check what's new and novelties as well? >>> >>>Well, believe it or not it is the same thing...I mean the chances to win without >>>this is like without a good opening book for a chess program. >>> >>>Sandro >> >> >>Read this and you will realize why it is a waste of your valuable time to debate >>with Mr. Blass. >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?412706 > >I did not reply earlier to that post of sandro because I did not see >big difference between my opinion and sandro's opinion. > >My opinion is simply that the interesting part is the engine and not book >preperation against computer opponents. > All the components are interesting and important. You have already said. The book is _unimportant. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?412706 Of course, there are difference in your opinion and the Necchi´s opinion. >The point is that an engine that prefer opening A and not opening B may be able >to play better opening B and not opening A after it is improved. > I have have already said you this for years. Perhaps, you have begun to understand my point.... >It means that the book maker will need to change the opening book to teach it to >prefer opening B and not opening A. > >In other words the book for tournament 1 may be little relevance to future >tournament 2 when the work of the author for tournament 1 is still relevant for Well, again you are at the beginning.... That is so obvious, when has a book of a top engine never been updated for the next Tournament? God............ >tournament 2 because without the basis that he had in toutnament 1 he could not >improve the engine for tournament 2. > The books are tested and adapted continuosly to the engines changes. Why you pretend to draw conclusions that have been already known for years? The unusual world of Mr. Blass..... :)))))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.