Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's wrong with Shredder?

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 02:37:24 02/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 1999 at 10:40:08, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:

>>>3. a player with an advantage of 20-25 ELO may expect a win of 53% - 54%
>>
>>So in this case, do we assume Shredder3 being equal to Hiarcs7? If so Shredder3,
>>running on the faster hardware, should get the 53-54%, at the moment he even has
>>no 40%. Or does it count into the margin of error?
>>
>>>So, you may (almost) ignore Shredder's speed advantage.
>>
>>Oops. Ignoring means that Shredder3 should/would perform on a MMX166 like on
>>that K6-200??
>>I don't think so.
>
>Don't miss the "almost" in my statement above. Sure if I had the choice; I'd
>take the K6-200.

Aha.

>As I said, the estimate is fishy anyway and shouldn't be taken too seriously.
>However it should give the right order of magnitude.
>Uli

OK. What do you say now as the match is finished and Hiarcs7/MMX166/47MB hash
won 26-14 against Shredder3/K6-200/24+8MB hash?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.