Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 19:20:20 09/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2005 at 20:03:49, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>I was thinking along the same lines myself, I am certainly using a lot of >>Chessbase engines and not complaining that they aren't UCI. So it is a valid >>point. > >So if someone have at some point complained that CB engines are not UCI, then >they are not hypocrites?... :) > >I don't think it is hypocritical to own chessbase products and then want a new >upcoming engine to be UCI compatible, that to me is real nonsense on GCP's part. >It can be WB2 and whatever format too, but if it is not UCI i will not buy it as >i want to use it seamlessly between different GUI's. Of Course Even the chessbase gui is uci compatible How can anyone dump on chessbase while supporting the introduction of a non uci supporting gui Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.