Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 08:47:32 09/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2005 at 10:58:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 05, 2005 at 10:40:28, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>Significance means without reasonable doubts, Uri. ;) > >I understand but not significant results by that definition still may be >significant for people or in other words important for people. > >I think that information that does not give significant results for >the question which program is better may be still important for the customers >and it is better than no information. > >Uri Uri, as you know in special women often have a sense for the supernatural, this is why we are calling them witches from time to time. They offer you informations about your destiny. Of course they offer informations. But would you say that therefore their informations are significant? I fear you are confusing the quality of informations with the wish of all of us to know something about these fields where we can't get significant informations. We know what a clairvoyant witch is doing but we think CC testers have something better in their sleeves and this is wrong. There is only the significance of data or the nothing. Now you can claim that you would already be satisfied with a portion of nothing. And that this is better than nothing. But I fear that you have already become a follower of withcraft without knowing it. Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.