Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 15:46:30 09/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2005 at 00:17:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 04, 2005 at 20:12:36, Barry Culp wrote: > >>Interesting points on the some of the failings of Chessbase. No argument from me >>on there. >> >>However I use the CB GUI. I like Zappa 1.1 enough to use it there as a UCI >>engine. >> >>Now its possible that the commercial version Zappa 2.0 will not support UCI. So >>does anyone expect me to buy it ? The free version has UCI. The commercial >>version may not. Get real .. you are offering something in the free version >>that is NOT in the commercial version . Why should I buy it ? It doesnt work in >>the GUI that I prefer. Not gonna happen. I am not a hypocrite.. REALITY check >>please. >> >>Ryan > >You are not hypocrite if you say that the reason for not buying it is that it >does not work under chessbase. > >The point of GCP was that people who complain that it is not UCI engine when >they only want to use it under chessbase are hypocrite because their real reason >is "it does not work under chessbase" and they do not say it. > >Uri What about Arena, Shredder classic and the others who do support UCI? Are they not valid reasons for wanting a UCI version? Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.