Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:15:42 11/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2005 at 09:14:52, Steve B wrote: > >>if this is true and the ram is only 4 KByte, it should be weaker then the rebel5 >>module. >> >>louwmann wrote about this. >> >>then the module would be from 1985. > >are you saying the Wiki entry is incorrect? >i cant understand all of the German in the entry > >if so,tell Bernhard who wrote the entry: > >http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67615/messages/2948.htm > >Steve i am saying that : louwmann says the 1985er module had only 4 KByte and that this version was not strong. it cannot have played the good results. if these modules you have do have 2x2 KByte ram, they are the weak version. i wonder how much RAM the B+P and MMII had. IF they had 4 KByte (2x2) then its clear that the version with unchanged RAMs (see picture you gave) is the WEAK version. louwmann could not have outplayed the good results with THIS weak 4KByte version. so there must exist versions with CHANGED (upgraded) RAMS. on the picture you gave the ram has no sockets. it was not changed. did louwmann play on OTHER prototypes ?! maybe looking more like rebel5 hardware ?!
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.