Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Probably not 18, because CORRECT It's 19

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 07:27:59 12/01/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 01, 2005 at 10:08:40, F. Huber wrote:

>On December 01, 2005 at 09:57:16, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On December 01, 2005 at 05:26:09, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>Chest don't find it (with checks it is mate in 19).
>>
>>Let the engine run longer. Shredder finds it in 18
>
>and this is definitely wrong!
>
>From your posting I only can see the following Shredder analysis:
>
>...
>1.Rh4+ Kg8 2.Rh8+ Kxh8 3.Qh4+ Kg8 4.Qxd8+ Kh7 5.Rh4+ Kg6 6.Qd3+
>  +-  (#18)   Depth: 28/28   00:08:15  53725kN
>
>And with this mainline (up to 6.Qd3+) there´s NO following #12 -
>I´ve checked this with ChestUCI in brute-force mode!
>
>So if you really believe in Shredder´s #18 announcement, then simply post
>the full PV and I´ll tell you, where it´s wrong ...

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?465853
>
>Franz.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.