Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:39:53 12/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2005 at 15:32:16, K. Burcham wrote: > >Doctor said programs have improved so that now the stupid programs do not allow >Father to win with wall or with time. > >Doctor said if it was not for Father these improvements would not have been >made. > >Doctor said that because of Father, these stupid programs will not allow Father >to mate with his same play he keeps using. > >Then Doctor laughs because Father exposes this weakness in programs that will >lose to Father. > >Then programmers make improvements to not allow this type of win. > >Then Doctor laughs at huge success of Father that forced improved programs. > >Now maybe outside world will never know this old weakness. > >Please Father please expose other weakness so that when we have another high >dollar, Program vs Super GM Match, we will not have some stupid weakness that >others cannot find. > >Watch my keyboard type this phoney id, > >Doctor kburcham, phd, dd, sd, mdd, dad, doc, dodad, hahahahahahahahahaha >LMAO at mickey mouse posts I can add that the fact that pablo lost does not mean that improvement were made. It is known that Pablo can only draw or win part of the games by his method and looking at the last 2 games it seems that pablo lost because of tactical mistakes that he can avoid in a good day. The second mistake in drawn position is easy to avoid The first mistake is not so easy to avoid but learning not to repeat the same type of mistake is not hard and the number of possible mistakes in closed positions is limited. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.