Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:39:55 12/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2005 at 14:22:54, chandler yergin wrote: >On December 02, 2005 at 12:21:55, F. Huber wrote: > >>On December 02, 2005 at 11:12:54, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On December 02, 2005 at 10:42:16, Rob Basham wrote: >>> >>>>[D]3Q4/bp3pp1/6k1/8/7R/6p1/B2p1PP1/q1rn2K1 w - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>This is the recent neat Mate in 19 problem...after 5 moves are played... >>>> >>>>1. Qd3+ >>>> >>>>CM-9000 ann. mate in 14 in 39 seconds.....SKR >>>> >>>>P3_850 >>>> >>>>Rob >>> >>>Try Mate in 11 in 00:02 >>>New game >>>[D]3Q4/bp3pp1/6k1/8/7R/6p1/B2p1PP1/q1rn2K1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Shredder 8: >>> >>>1.Qxd2 Nxf2+ 2.Qe1 >>> -+ (-6.24) Depth: 1/5 00:00:00 >>>1.Qxd2 Nxf2+ 2.Qd1 Nxd1+ 3.Rd4 >>> -+ (-16.91) Depth: 1/5 00:00:00 >>>1.Qxd2 Nxf2+ 2.Qd1 Nxd1+ 3.Rd4 >>> -+ (-16.91) Depth: 1/5 00:00:00 >>>1.Qh8 gxf2+ 2.Kf1 Qxa2 >>> -+ (-12.13) Depth: 1/5 00:00:00 >>>1.Qh8 Qxa2 >>> -+ (-10.84) Depth: 1/5 00:00:00 >>>1.Qh8 gxf2+ 2.Kf1 Qxa2 >>> -+ (-10.77) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd5 Nxf2# >>> -+ (-8.59) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd5 Nxf2# >>> -+ (-8.59) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Bc4 Nxf2+ >>> -+ (-8.46) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >>>1.Bc4 Nxf2+ 2.Bf1 >>> -+ (-8.46) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >>>1.Bd5 Nxf2# >>> -+ (-8.41) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >>>1.Bd5 Nxf2# >>> -+ (-8.41) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 2/2 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 3/3 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 4/4 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 5/5 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 6/6 00:00:00 >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 7/7 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 8/8 00:00:00 2kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 9/9 00:00:00 4kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 10/10 00:00:00 6kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 11/11 00:00:00 14kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 12/12 00:00:00 26kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 13/13 00:00:00 41kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 14/14 00:00:00 75kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 15/15 00:00:01 153kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ >>> +- (#14) Depth: 16/16 00:00:01 247kN >>>1.Qd3+ f5 2.Qxg3+ Kf6 3.Qd6+ Kg5 4.Rh5+ Kxh5 5.Qxd2 >>> +- (#11) Depth: 17/18 00:00:02 596kN >>> >>>(, MyTown 02.12.2005) >> >>And once again a wrong mate announcement by Shredder 8 - if I were you I would >>throw away this engine! >> >>BTW, how should a #19 become a #11 after 5 moves??? >> >>Franz. > >Easy.. it sees it. It may not be the best line and the evaluation may change >after deeper search! >If you like, I'll let it run longer. But how did you like the speed at which >it found Mate in 14? >Hmmm? Shredder is simply wrong because there. There is no mate in 11. Shortest mate is mate in 14 [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "New game"] [Black "?"] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3Q4/bp3pp1/6k1/8/7R/6p1/B2p1PP1/q1rn2K1 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "27"] 1. Qd3+ f5 2. Qxg3+ Kf6 3. Qd6+ Kg5 4. Rh5+ Kxh5 5. Bf7+ Kg5 6. Qg3+ Kf6 7. Qg6+ Ke5 8. Qe6+ Kf4 9. g3+ Kg4 10. Qg6+ Kf3 11. Qxf5+ Ke2 12. Qb5+ Rc4 13. Qxc4+ Ke1 14. Qf1# 1-0 If Shredder does not agree with one of these moves tell me which move of white it does not agree. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.