Author: William Penn
Date: 13:15:19 12/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2005 at 15:35:33, Arnold Gove wrote: >I'm not entirely sure what your point is, but I'd like to get into the same >spirit with some more analysis. > >[D]2r5/4bprk/pB2b1p1/P2pP2p/3N1R1P/q2PQ3/6P1/5RK1 b - - > >Tiger 2004 > >(+0.20) d=19 1...Bg4 2.Rxf7 Rxf7 3.Rxf7 Kg8 4.Rf1 Bxh4 5.Nf3 Be7 6.e6 Bxf3 >7.Qxf3 Rf8 8.Qe2 Rf6 9.Kh1 >(+0.44) d=19 1...Rc3 2.Nxe6 fxe6 3.Qf2 Rc1 4.Kh2 Rxf1 5.Qxf1 Qc3 6.d4 Qc4 7.Qf2 >Qc6 8.Qe2 >(+0.40) d=19 1...Kg8 2.Nxe6 fxe6 3.Qh3 Rc6 4.R4f3 Qb2 5.d4 Qc2 6.Kh2 g5 7.hxg5 >Rxg5 8.Rf4 Qc3 9.R1f2 I'm curious, how long did you let it run with the Tiger? I'm not sure what my point is either... :) Except that everyone seems to be looking for clear answers and a solution to the game of chess by all means possible - human thought as well as computers. But it seems to me at this point most of the game of chess is still unfathomable. In other words, despite our best efforts, we don't really know for sure what is the best chess move - most of the time. Sometimes we do, but most of the time we don't. WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.