Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 04:01:41 12/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2005 at 06:54:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 04, 2005 at 06:43:01, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>On December 04, 2005 at 06:35:35, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I do not know about double checks when a piece that moved does not give check. >> >>Hi Uri, >> >>[D]8/8/3k4/2pP4/8/B2R4/4K3/8 w - c6 0 1 >> >>I just composed that. Watch the Pawn e.p. capture move. >> >>Reinhard. > >Hi Reinhard, >Thanks I see it now. [D]> >It seems that enpassent is the only case that it can happen and it can only >happen from rook a1-a8 direction and diagnol direction. >I thought about enpassent capture earlier but not about this example but about >checks from h5-a5 direction. > >Fortunately this example does not lead to a bug in movei. >I had in the past a bug when I assumed that checks cannot be done from 2 rook >directions but calculating the direction of checks after a move is not done >based on the previous move. Hi Uri, e.p. could be strange. See that e.p. is impossible, PINNED through two pieces at [D]8/1k6/8/1KpP1r2/8/8/8/8 w - c6 0 1 Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.