Author: William Penn
Date: 18:26:46 12/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2005 at 18:26:55, James Constance wrote: >On December 04, 2005 at 18:21:59, Ryan B. wrote: > >>On December 04, 2005 at 18:19:16, James Constance wrote: >> >>>Why is it Toga II (i.e. 2) 1.1 (that is Toga 2 1.1)? What's wrong with Toga >>>2.1?? Bloody confusing :( >> >>The II is part of the name not the version number. > >Yes, and that's confusing! Toga is a Roman word (a one-piece cloak worn by men in ancient Rome), thus a Roman Numeral... :) WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.