Author: Andrey Popov
Date: 22:03:18 12/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2005 at 18:19:16, James Constance wrote: >Why is it Toga II (i.e. 2) 1.1 (that is Toga 2 1.1)? What's wrong with Toga >2.1?? Bloody confusing :( IMO, it is due to Fruit numbering: Toga was based on Fruit, Toga II was based on Fruit 2.0, Toga II 1.0 was based on Fruit 2.1 Toga II 1.1 was based on Fruit 2.1 too. I can be wrong, of course.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.