Author: Graham Banks
Date: 01:30:33 12/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2005 at 04:19:16, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On December 05, 2005 at 04:15:31, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >Dear Community, my question was only a question not more. Now I am testing Rybka >and in my opinion Rybka is not a clone. > >It was only a simple question and not against the program or programmer. > >In my first tests, Rybka is very strong! > >In mate positions say Rybka ever +320, not bad! > >Here a very nice position, Rxc6!! is the best move: > >[D]3r1rk1/2p1qppp/p1n5/1p1bP1N1/3pNQ2/1P6/PP3PPP/2RR2K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit: > >1.Sxh7 Sxe5 2.Sxf8 Kxf8 3.Sg3 c5 4.Sf5 Sg6+ > +- (2.24) Tiefe: 10 00:00:41 565kN >1.Sxh7 Sxe5 2.Sxf8 Kxf8 3.Sg3 c5 4.Sf5 Sg6+ 5.Dg4 > +- (2.10) Tiefe: 11 00:00:52 720kN >1.Sxh7 Sxe5 2.Sxf8 Kxf8 3.Sc5 Lc6 4.Dg3 Dd6 5.Te1 Te8 > +- (2.20) Tiefe: 12 00:01:17 1141kN >1.Sxh7 Sxe5 2.Sxf8 Kxf8 3.Sg3 c5 4.Sf5 g5 5.Dd2 Df6 > +- (1.91) Tiefe: 13 00:02:03 1942kN >1.Txc6 Lxc6 2.Sf6+ gxf6 3.Sxh7 fxe5 4.Sf6+ Dxf6 5.Dxf6 Td6 > +- (2.13) Tiefe: 13 00:02:30 2375kN > >(Nemeth, Privat 05.12.2005) > >On my slow P3 600 MHz and 32-Bit Version, Rybka find this move after 2:30 Min. > >COOL. > >My Congrats to the Programmer, then I seems that Rybka will be a very strong >program in the future! > >Best, >Eduard. Hi Eduard, I'd go as far as to say that Rybka 1.0 is number one now, Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.