Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Rybka - not an endgame expert

Author: Vasik Rajlich

Date: 07:33:19 12/05/05

Go up one level in this thread

On December 05, 2005 at 08:34:26, Gabor Szots wrote:

>Just two examples. Positions taken from from PET.
>
>
>8/5k2/4p3/4Pp1p/5P1P/3Rn2K/6p1/8 b - - bm g1=B;                id "PET026: rook
>vs knight";
>
>Here Rybka plays g1Q, although it does see it is only draw.
>
>
>8/8/1P1k2p1/8/5P1p/4Qb2/1q4PK/8 w - - bm Qe5+;                 id "PET046: Q+B
>vs Q";
>
>Rybka captures at f3.
>
>
>Both positions are easily solved by most of the engines. Position No26 usually
>in 0 seconds.

Thanks for the positions, however my even worse answer is that I am aware of
this :( You will probably have to wait for Rybka 2.0 sometime next year.

The only bug in this thread that will definitely be fixed for Rybka 1.0 is the
one given by GCP - a chess engine should be able to mate with KQQ v K :)

Vas

• Re: Rybka - not an endgame expert Günther Simon 08:34:35 12/05/05
• Re: Rybka - not an endgame expert Uri Blass 07:45:30 12/05/05
  • Re: Rybka - not an endgame expert Vasik Rajlich 07:51:34 12/05/05
    • Rybka for the PPC? Albert Silver 08:29:44 12/05/05
      • Re: Rybka for the PPC? Vasik Rajlich 14:48:46 12/05/05
        • Re: Rybka for the PPC? Albert Silver 18:14:06 12/05/05
    • Re: Rybka - not an endgame expert Paul Jacobean Sacral 08:00:10 12/05/05
      • Re: Rybka - not an endgame expert Vasik Rajlich 14:49:47 12/05/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.