Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Actually . . . . .

Author: George Tsavdaris

Date: 12:18:34 12/05/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 05, 2005 at 15:14:18, Joseph Tadeusz wrote:

>On December 05, 2005 at 15:01:48, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>
>>On December 05, 2005 at 11:18:56, Zappa wrote:
>>
>>>It does take longer, though.
>>>
>>>1. Nc3-d5!!
>>> = (0.49)	Depth: 16/39	00:01:29.21	256838kN (2879 KN/s, 21111 splits, 1206
>>>aborts)
>>
>> The fact that an engine plays it in 1 hour and a half does not have any
>>practical  importance at games......If we speak about correspondence Chess then
>>yes this is important, but if an engine doesn't find a move in less than 14
>>minutes in a top hardware then we can't say that the engine solves the position
>>at normal game time.....
>
>It's one and a half minute.

Damn....! How moron can i be.........The damn centiseconds confused me.......



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.