Author: Per Jørgensen
Date: 02:56:28 12/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2005 at 05:19:47, Bigler wrote: >Hi all, > >ok, its maybe a bit early to figure out any conclusions. > >for sure Rybka is very strong. > >when looking at CEGT results after 24 games ELO 2907 (I know very few games...) >and when reading other results published yesterday where Rybka scored around 65% >against all other top engines, I would have said yes, maybe this engine is over >100 ELO point stronger than Fritz 9 and Fruit 2.2.1 > > >After the very short match I have played Fruit 2.2.1 and Rybka at 20min + 2sec, >the score is even, 5,5/11 >reading now that Fritz 9 leads at 20min match and that Junior 9 also resits very >well at this time control, I have 2 interogations : > >- is 20min not a good time control for Rybka and if yes, why ? >- Is Rybka still around 100 ELO points stronger than Fritz 9 and Fruit 2.2.1 ? > >thanks for you inputs Hi Bigler! I wouldn't dare to predict a 100 ELO difference between Rybka and Fritz 9+Fruit 2.2.1. I just posted my testresults: 16½-13½ victory for Rybka against both Fruit 2.2.1 and Fruitz 9 (check my posting for testdetails). What is quite certain is that Rybka belongs in the topclass with Shredder 9, Fruit 2.2.1 and Fritz 9. It might be a bit stronger but it will depend on exact testconditions and the Hardware being used. No matter what, Rybka seems to be an amazing engine and we should all be happy that there is a new contender for the number 1 spot. Regards Per
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.