Author: Mark Ryan
Date: 10:46:07 12/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2005 at 13:39:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 16, 2005 at 13:37:55, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 16, 2005 at 13:33:06, James Constance wrote: >> >>> >>>>I believe that top chess programs can get the GM title in correspondence games >>>>and I will not be surprised if hydra also can get it(I do not know if it is >>>>stronger or weaker than other programs in correspondence games). >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>If the correspondence players are using chess engines when they analyze, surely >>>the top chess programs won't have a chance !? >> >>Of course the correspondence players use chess engines but the engines still >>have good chances because the correspondence players usually use the engines for >>less time and with inferior hardware. >> >>Uri > >I can add that it is also not clear if human+engine is always stronger than >engine because humans may choose inferior moves because they do not understand >the position and decide for no good reason to reject the engine's moves. > >Uri It is an open question, but the Freestyle tournament (won by ZackS) was dominated by humans aided by computers. Mark
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.