Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:06:25 01/17/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2006 at 18:27:05, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On January 17, 2006 at 17:47:56, Tord Romstad wrote: > > >>"Fail-low pruning" was a new name to me, but it is not a bad name. >>The technique was not invented by me, although I like to think that >>I played some role in popularising it. > >Tord - can you provide some generalized pseudo-code showing what it is? > >I use a basic PVS searcher I stole out of a very old Tony Marsland article >but would be willing to try a switch if you think fail-low pruning is better >than PVS. It is still a pvs search. It just uses a special technique to avoid spending too much time in crappy branches.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.