Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A plea to all computer chess enthusiasts (short)

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 14:57:56 02/09/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 09, 2006 at 15:51:44, Tord Romstad wrote:

>On February 08, 2006 at 22:17:11, Will Singleton wrote:
>
>>Uh huh.  It might have long been clear to you, but was that before Fruit or
>>after?  I recall when Ruffian came out, people could scarcely believe its
>>strength.  No one, folks said, could develop such a strong amateur program in
>>relative secrecy, and then just burst on the scene.  But Ruffian never
>>approached commercial strength.
>>
>>And then came Fruit.  Not an evolutionary change, not forseen, not anticipated.
>>One day the commercials ruled, then Fruit came out.  That was the change.  Only
>>after that did programs begin to "surpass the old giants."  I'm not criticizing,
>>only pointing out that the change was sudden, not evolutionary, and no one
>>predicted it.
>
>You have been around longer than I, but I will persist in claiming that the
>change
>has been evolutionary in nature.   The progress has not been completely linear,
>and you are probably right that it has accelerated in the last couple of years,
>but
>the rate of improvement was remarkably high long before Fruit appeared (the
>first really strong version of Fruit 2.0, which is only about one year old).
>Just
>look at the results from the first few editions of WBEC and compare them to the
>results from the last couple of years and see for yourself.

I ran a couple fairly large chess program contests in 1999-2000 (Battle of the
Crowns) and 2000-2002 (The Gauntlett -- unfortunately, my main machine died so
that one never completed).  Anyway, many of the programs that were in the top
groups in those contests would be in groups 2 and 3 of Leo's contests.

Here are BOTC results (Amy was the 4th strongest engine of all freely
available):

 1 LGoliath
 2 Crafty
 3 AnMon
 4 Amy
 5 SOS
 6 Bringer
 7 TCBishop
 8 Phalanx
 9 Comet
10 Gromit3

Here are Gauntlet results (Amy was the 8th strongest engine of all freely
available):

 1 Crafty-18.10
 2 Yace 0.99.50
 3 LG2000V3
 4 Comet-B37
 5 ZChess-222
 6 TCBishop-4601
 7 MAD-005
 8 Amy-07
 9 Phalanx-xxii
10 AnMon-510

In WBEC, Phalanx is #65, and in my old contests it is listed as #8 or #9.
Comet B.68 is #40 on WBEC.
In AEGT, Phalanx is #119 and Comet B.54 is #67
In Lyapko's list, Comet is #45 and Phalanx is #38



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.