Author: Chessfun
Date: 10:41:31 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2006 at 13:24:25, Chessfun wrote: >On February 11, 2006 at 09:05:48, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On February 11, 2006 at 04:26:01, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 11, 2006 at 04:13:45, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On February 10, 2006 at 15:55:55, Russell wrote: >>>> >>>>>I dont agree with the list. H10 Hypermodern is not stronger than Fritz 9 nor is >>>>>S9 sronger than Fritz 9. >>>> >>>>Our current testing at 4040 I would say I am sure Fritz 9 is not weaker than >>>>Shredder 9. Hiarcs 10 hypermodern we are still continuing to test. I do though >>>>think Fritz 9 is much stronger than the list seems to indicate but as with all >>>>rating list that is also why there are + and - error bars. >>>> >>>>http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/rating-table-all.shtml >>>> >>>>Sarah >>> >>>Your results are based on different conditions(as far as I know you do not use >>>original book or pondering). >>>It is possible that Fritz9 is better in your conditions and shredder9 is better >>>in ssdf conditions. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Yes, the SSDF is the only list to use the actual opening books provided with the >>programs, so it may very well be that the book provided with Fritz 9 is simply >>inefficient compared to the books made for the other top programs. >> >> Albert > >Actually my own rating list is also with original books: >http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/rating.html > >Sarah I'll beat someone to it by adding true not with autoplayer as standard and not with pondering on as standard. Sarah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.