Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 19:51:16 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 14:33:01, Gabor Szots wrote: >On March 06, 2006 at 05:40:03, Alex Shalamanov wrote: > >>Will Shredder 10 be comparative to Rybka 1.1 in chess strength? > >I am sceptic about a big breakthrough by Shredder. How can we expect great >improvements from a program that is a dozen years old and haven't made >significant progress in recent years? >I am sure that to make a big jump in strength (which Shredder would need to >catch up with Rybka) you have to introduce revolutionary ideas or at least >completely rewrite your old program structure. This is what Robert Hyatt is >currently doing, I think. > >Gábor Do you think that its possible that he didnt improve the chessprogram because there wasnt much competition? Do you think that Shredder has history pruning? If not he can gain about 40 elo from adding history pruning to his eval like many other programmers have done. Just an opinion, I am not a programmer, now SMK has the fruit code to look at. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.