Author: Mark Young
Date: 05:17:48 05/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 1999 at 08:02:24, Francis Monkman wrote: > >On May 27, 1999 at 23:41:20, Mark Young wrote: > > >>I seen that you had Fritz 5's results over reported, the same is true for >>Hiarcs7. Here are the times I got for Hiarcs7 running on a PII 400. >> >>g3-g4 0-23 seconds. >> >>e5-c6 24 seconds. >> >>g2xd5 65 seconds. >> >>b2-d4 96 seconds. > >I've posted my 'accurate timings' for Fritz, and they seem to make some sense in >terms >of the hardware used. True I'm running Hiarcs 7 on an older machine (180 MHz), >and with limited hash, but this discrepancy seems too great! I understand that >Melvin Schwartz also got timings faster than mine (not sure what he's running), >but the time taken to reject g4 was also several minutes. I also get a different >sequence of choices from yours (?). > >Francis I don't know what to tell you, my times are correct. I ran in dos 98, with 64mb hash for the hiarcs7 program. The position was cut and pasted to my epd file. I don't know why your times are so bad, this was an easy position for hiarcs7.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.