Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:39:30 06/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 1999 at 07:10:59, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: >Oh yes, > >in view of Vincent's long story and his many excuses why "Diep" did not >fare too well again (no hardware excuses possible this time), I like to >add that meaningful *testing* is obviously a crucial part of program >development -- not only in computer chess. > >If people decide to enter a world championship with an untested program, >this is fine with me. But then, they should also stand by their decision >and accept the blame in case of severe failure instead of whining about >their immature and buggy code. It was their own independent decision to >employ it in the first place, wasn't it ... > >=Ernst= I'm nowhere whining Ernst, i'm just analyzing what went wrong after i got a question to do so. At least i can explain what went wrong in my program. Can you?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.